2008年12月8日月曜日

コメントについて

コメントをもらえることは非常にうれしい。
批判を受ければ自分自身の考えを更に整理することが出来るし
何より読み手があってこそ文章を書く意味が見いだせる。
日記を書いて読み手が自分自身だったりもする。
それも良いと思う。

ブログと関係ないコメントは消去すべきだという人もいるし
トップページ以外にブックマークしてほしく無い人もいる。

スラッシュドットなんかはコメント欄の方が重要だと思ったりする。
コメント欄もコンテンツの1つである。
電車男なんかはコメントの集まりで、みんなで作った作品だと思う。
コンテンツの印税はどうするのかという問題もあるけど。

僕は他の人が色々なことを考えるのは自由だし
よっぽどのことが無い限りコメントを削除しようとは思わないけど
やっぱり読んでくれる人がいてこそだと考えると、
見たい情報が読めなくなるような
「荒らし」や「虚偽」は制限しなくてはとも思う。
どこまでが「荒らし」や「虚偽」なのか判断基準は難しいけど。

メディアは時間や紙面など制約から意図的に情報を加工しなくてはならない。
しかしながら翼賛報道みたいなことになってはいけない。
テレビを見ている人はどれだけそのことを自覚しているのだろう。

電気ネットワークのギュウゾウがブログのコメント
を勝手に削除されていたと激怒
し、
真偽は定かではないが中川翔子がブログの検閲に涙したという。

ギュウゾウ氏は次のようなことを言っている。
「真剣な討論の中で人は育つ。
それは書き手側も同様だ。
これが出来ないのはほんとに残念だ」


ひろゆき氏もメディアの赤字と頭の弱い人を優遇すること
なんて挑戦的なことを書いている。

黒澤明の羅生門
は「真実は薮の中」だということを伝えている。
とは言っても僕は真実を探求したいと思うし、
真摯に向き合う姿勢が重要だと思う。

こんなことを書くと荒れるのかなぁ。

3 コメント:

匿名 さんのコメント...

Hello Masumi!
This is JIM!!
I love you!!!

It's after a long absence.
After all I was not able to forget you.

I want to defend about 荒らしcomment.

Ree and Jussi and Drucken and Fransowa are not my friends.

Perhaps somebody would go into mischief.

For example, Swahiri and Muhanmad are my close friends.

They were my classmate in US.

Swahiri works at the financial institution, and Muhanamad is a teacher in Japanese international school.

All the other people are my friends, too.

Though Masumi said that I feel fear, it is wrong.
It is very sad if you dislike a foreigner.

By the way, today's agenda is this!

Masumi wrote an article about Blog in the latest blog, so I give an opinion about Blog too.

Masumi said Resurrection of the late 1990s. 1<3<2? In 2008.
And then which came first? Web 2.0 or Web 3.0 Technologies?

This is very interesting question Masumi!

I think technology that supported Web 2.0 appeared around 1999.
Microsoft created the asynchronous javascript to support Microsoft OWA and some other pieces of software.
It was an interesting offshoot of the DHTML r-evolution.

Some (notably Tim O'Reilly and me) define Web 2.0 as a participatory movement.
The evolution of WebPages into a two-way "interactive" medium can be seen as a consolidation of email, chat and newsgroups that were popular since 1980s.
These e-communication paradigms became more public in nature - transforming into blogs and social networks.
Written in HTML pages - rather than pure text files.

In effect, Web 2.0 was the remoulding of old communication paradigms into a Hypertext driven world. Newsgroups were wild social networks. Newsgroups were blogs that had no response control.
The point is that global human participatory interaction over the net was identifiable since the 1980s.

Since 1996, XML - a derivative of SGML which rose out of IBM in the 1960's - has been touted as the next lingua-franca of the net. RDF, OWL and other XML languages and standards were proposed and formulated between 1997-1999.
Semantic web started effectively circa 1998 as an identifiable paradigm.

Do you know Semantic web, Masumi?

In the history of the web, Web 2.0 may probably be remembered as a distraction. It is not surprising that Tim Berners-Lee discouraged the notion of Web 2.0 as being significant.

Web 2.0 may be identified as the time we took our eyes off the web - and started looking at ourselves as the center of a self-less web. It may be marked as the time when the selfish "we" became the center of a form-less web.

Now we are back to the roots again. We are back to making machines understand us.

Web 3.0 is truly an enigmatic mixture of machines and information - a space where men go like spiders looking for entertainment, news, food, love, work and life. Far from being participants, humans are becoming part of the web.

匿名 さんのコメント...

Hi Jim.
I do not love you.and also I do not hate you.because I do not know you well.But thanks for your comment.

Anyway,your indication is very interestig.I am doing Semantic Web business,and understand the technical issues.

I think that web2.0 is hackneyed phrases.But the concept is abstracted from experiences as sensory patterns.There is a lot of accuracy in the perception.

And we also SHOULD recognize that web2.0 is hard to make more money.

someone said that Web 2.0 is dead because it was a shallow term coined to just say something was different.

But this is concept.concept will never die.concepet wll just chanege like a "Cloud Computing".
I've got a lot of inspiration from this.And let's The argument over.

Now,it is time to do.

匿名 さんのコメント...

Hi Masumi!
Thank you for your cool comment!

I love you!
You live in Hiyosi.
So I decided to live in Hiyosi.
And I am divorced.

I'll marry Masumi.
Responsibility give me it.

Project10X that handled the consulting concerning the product and service that used the semantic technology and them announced the semantic technology that entitled, "Semantic Wave 2008:Industry Roadmap to Web 3.0 Multibillion Dollar Market Opportunities (Wave 2008 of semantic: market opportunity for several billion dollar scale)" the investigation report that consisted of 400 pages concerning the influence on the market.

This report has treated evolution from semantic technology for the consumer, appearance of a corporate application, and web 2.0 to so-called "Web 3.0".

The outline document from which the report of Project10X is put together on page 27 can be obtained free of charge.

This outline report is the one only of it to be worthy though it is necessary to fill in the name and the E-mail address, and to answer some easy questions.

In this report, web 3.0 is defined, "The meaning expresses the meaning, ties knowledge, uses them, and is deep, and uses the Internet for me or more to make it happily conveniently".

It is ,in a word, semantic Web. It agrees strengthening of the semantic technology the age of a present social web to me though it doesn't so like expression "Web 3.0", and entering in the expanded age.

This has been written with ReadWriteWeb many times.

For instance, Alex Iskold wrote recently.

「Semantic Web: Does the killer application that becomes the priming of the spread by the group of users :?」I want you to read the article.

Moreover, "Web 4.0" is defined in this report as follows.

「Afterwards, web 4.0 comes. Web 4.0 ties intelligence in the ubiquitous web environment.

It communicates mutually as man and other one have a clear intention there respectively. 」

The following figure shows the concept of tying the version of these webs well.

This report correctly points out that it is not the one that the age when the semantic application was new was limited to a traditional W3C technology.

Here,「Web 3.0 is the one where all semantic technologies and open standards that can be applied as a platform on a present web are included. This is not the one limited to a present semantic Web standard. 」It is described.

In this report, a profitable discussion is done by this semantic Web about the kind of the expected outcome. For instance, a web browser is assumed to be "A browser of web 3.0 understands the semantics of data, mediates information, and translates the meta data automatically".

We are discussing the mechanism operating as an information broker by Firefox 3's using the micro format and other technologies by this blog before.

Moreover, this report outlines some interesting trends. For instance, the identity is described, "The flow faces the semantic avatar, and becomes possible the operation of the individual of his individual information in all places of the net, and management".

Another interesting flow is "Set knowledge system", and the user says, "The system cooperates to add contents, semantics, the model, and behavior each other, and comes to study and to use it easily" here.

When this is read, two applications of Twine and Freebase imagine me.

Details want it referring to article "Present of ten applications of the semantic Web that exists in the rise period and attention" of ReadWriteWeb.

Because the outline version of the report taken up this time is wonderful introductory material concerning these topics, I want you to read.

We wish to express our gratitude to Mr. Mills Davis of an initiator and a managing director of Project10X who sent this to us.

The center of the full text version of the report (It is sold) is a case study of 150 in the type of business of 14, and an inclusive investigation of the semantic Web that exists in the rise period now.

Thank you Masumi!
Yeah!
Ah!Ah!

Yo,Yo!
Masumi!!